Stock Photo 1

Pricing Background

LEARN MORE
Pricing Background Reviews and Testimonials  Frequently Asked Questions Partnerships and Collaborations

The cost to run traditional medical simulation varies widely depending on modality, scale, and context, but published analyses provide concrete estimates and highlight key cost drivers. 

For high-fidelity, in situ hospital trauma team simulation, the mean cost per participant was €203 (about $220 USD), and the mean cost per team was €1,220 (about $1,320 USD) for a 2-hour session. Annual costs for 40 sessions training 238 professionals totaled €58,000 (about $62,800 USD). Costs per team decrease as more teams are trained, reflecting economies of scale.[1] 

A multi-site neonatal simulation program in the U.S. reported a mean cost of $39,211 per site for program design and implementation, with personnel accounting for over 90% of costs. Monthly costs for ongoing neonatal resuscitation training during the program were about $1,113 per site, lower than pre-implementation costs ($2,504 per site).[2] 

Key cost components include: 

Cost-effectiveness depends on the number of learners, frequency of sessions, and whether simulation replaces or augments other training. Reporting of cost elements in the literature is often incomplete, but comprehensive models for cost analysis are available and recommended for future studies.[4][5] 


In summary, running traditional medical simulation typically costs several hundred to several thousand dollars per session or participant, with personnel and equipment as the main drivers while costs may decrease with scale.[1][2][3] 


References 

  1. 1. Costs of Hospital Trauma Team Simulation Training: A Prospective Cohort Study. Rosqvist E, Ylönen M, Torkki P, Repo JP, Paloneva J. BMJ Open. 2021;11(6):e046845. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046845. 
  2. 2. Implementation of a Multi-Site Neonatal Simulation Improvement Program: A Cost Analysis. Xu X, Yao J, Bohnert J, Yamada N, Lee HC. BMC Health Services Research. 2024;24(1):623. doi:10.1186/s12913-024-11075-z. 
  3. 3. A Cost-Utility Analysis Comparing Traditional Clinical, Manikin-Based Simulation, and Screen-Based Virtual Simulation Activities. Haerling KA, Miller CW. The Journal of Nursing Education. 2024;63(2):79-85. doi:10.3928/01484834-20231205-04.
  4. 4. Cost: The Missing Outcome in Simulation-Based Medical Education Research: A Systematic Review. Zendejas B, Wang AT, Brydges R, Hamstra SJ, Cook DA. Surgery. 2013;153(2):160-76. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2012.06.025. 
  5. 5. Communicating Value in Simulation: Cost-Benefit Analysis and Return on Investment. Asche CV, Kim M, Brown A, et al. Academic Emergency Medicine : Official Journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. 2018;25(2):230-237. doi:10.1111/acem.13327.